Services
Development Services
SEO Services
Automation & AI
Specialized Services
Industries
LLM Visibility Tracking
Monthly tracking of your brand across every major LLM
This is a recurring retainer service. Every month, we run structured prompt sets across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Gemini, measure how often your brand is cited versus competitors, and deliver a report with trend lines and recommended actions. AI search visibility without measurement is guesswork.
What the Tracking Retainer Includes
Five deliverables every month.
Structured Prompt Set Execution
We design and run 50-100 prompts per client per month across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Gemini. Prompt sets cover informational queries, comparison queries, recommendation queries, and brand-direct queries. Each category tells a different story about how AI systems perceive your brand.
- Custom prompt set design for your category
- Four-platform execution monthly
- Prompt set updates as your product or category evolves
- Consistent methodology for valid trend comparison
Citation Frequency Report
How often does your brand appear across the prompt set? We report raw citation counts, citation rate percentage, and trend versus last month. The citation frequency report is the headline metric: it tells you whether AI visibility is moving in the right direction.
- Overall citation rate per LLM
- Citation rate by query type
- Month-over-month trend lines
- Historical archive from program start
Competitive Share of Voice
Your citation rate matters more in context. If competitors are cited twice as often, your 20% citation rate is still a losing position. We track 3-5 named competitors monthly and report share of voice: what percentage of total citations in your category go to your brand.
- Competitive citation rate tracking (up to 5 competitors)
- Share of voice calculation by query type
- Competitor movement alerts
- Trend comparison with commentary
Citation Accuracy Monitoring
Being cited is good. Being cited accurately is better. We flag instances where AI systems cite your brand with incorrect information: wrong product descriptions, outdated pricing claims, inaccurate company details. These accuracy issues are fixable with the right content and entity signals.
- Accuracy review of all brand citations
- Misinformation flagging and documentation
- Recommended corrections per inaccuracy type
- Entity signal fixes for persistent errors
Monthly Action Report
Data without action is just cost. Every monthly report closes with a prioritized action list: which content changes would move citation frequency most, which entity signals are weakest, which competitor gains are most urgent to address. The report is designed to drive the next sprint.
- Prioritized optimization recommendations
- Estimated impact per recommendation
- Competitive threat assessment
- Optional implementation retainer add-on
Measurement Scope
Eight dimensions of AI search visibility, measured every month.
AI search visibility is not one number. It is a set of signals that tell different parts of the story. We track all eight.
Brand citation frequency across informational queries
Product or service recommendation appearances
Brand vs competitor share of voice
Citation accuracy and attribute correctness
Emerging competitor threats in AI-generated answers
Query type breakdown: informational, comparison, recommendation
Platform-specific citation rates (ChatGPT vs Perplexity vs Gemini vs Claude)
Citation position: primary source vs secondary mention
Tracking in Practice
How tracking caught a competitor surge before it affected pipeline.
The Challenge
A B2B project management SaaS company started LLM visibility tracking in Q1. Their baseline citation rate was 12% across the prompt set. By month 3, we flagged a competitor (a well-funded new entrant) whose citation rate had climbed from 8% to 31% over the same period. The competitor had published a series of original research pieces and earned coverage in TechCrunch and Forbes. Without the tracking data, the company would not have noticed until it showed up as lost deals.
Our Solution
The month 3 report included a specific competitive threat assessment: which content gaps the competitor had exploited, which publications had cited them, and what a counter-program would look like. The company activated an original research piece on project management productivity data, targeted the same publications for coverage, and implemented FAQ schema across their product comparison pages within 6 weeks of the alert.
Results Achieved
FAQ
LLM visibility tracking frequently asked questions
Start Measuring AI Visibility
Get your first LLM citation baseline in 30 days.
We set up your prompt set, run the first round across all four LLMs, and deliver a baseline report within 30 days. From there, the monthly retainer keeps your finger on the pulse of AI search.
- Custom prompt set design for your category
- Baseline report across 4 LLMs in 30 days
- Monthly trend tracking from month 2 onward